Comments on: Note To Self: The One And Only RD Projection String http://oegeo.wordpress.com/2008/05/20/note-to-self-the-one-and-only-rd-projection-string/ researching VGI Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:48:29 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: milovanderlinden http://oegeo.wordpress.com/2008/05/20/note-to-self-the-one-and-only-rd-projection-string/#comment-76 milovanderlinden Thu, 03 Jul 2008 21:33:49 +0000 http://oegeo.wordpress.com/?p=45#comment-76 I have a definition that is slightly more precise. I am using it in conjunction with aerial photography with a 10 cm resolution: +proj=sterea +lat_0=52.15616055555555 +lon_0=5.38763888888889 +k=0.999908 +x_0=155000 +y_0=463000 +ellps=bessel +units=m +towgs84=565.2369,50.0087,465.658,-0.406857330322398,0.350732676542563,-1.8703473836068,4.0812 +no_defs no_defs Hope this is of any help! I have a definition that is slightly more precise. I am using it in conjunction with aerial photography with a 10 cm resolution:

+proj=sterea +lat_0=52.15616055555555 +lon_0=5.38763888888889 +k=0.999908 +x_0=155000 +y_0=463000 +ellps=bessel +units=m +towgs84=565.2369,50.0087,465.658,-0.406857330322398,0.350732676542563,-1.8703473836068,4.0812 +no_defs no_defs

Hope this is of any help!

]]> By: mvexel http://oegeo.wordpress.com/2008/05/20/note-to-self-the-one-and-only-rd-projection-string/#comment-64 mvexel Wed, 21 May 2008 06:33:35 +0000 http://oegeo.wordpress.com/?p=45#comment-64 Morten, you're right, it's a matter of habit. I simply add the (former) 900913 projection to my epsg file in PROJ, and in MapServer it then becomes EPSG:900913, both in the map files and in the GET string. Morten, you’re right, it’s a matter of habit. I simply add the (former) 900913 projection to my epsg file in PROJ, and in MapServer it then becomes EPSG:900913, both in the map files and in the GET string.

]]> By: Morten http://oegeo.wordpress.com/2008/05/20/note-to-self-the-one-and-only-rd-projection-string/#comment-63 Morten Wed, 21 May 2008 05:17:32 +0000 http://oegeo.wordpress.com/?p=45#comment-63 Just for the record: 900913 has never been an EPSG code, so prefixing it with EPSG: is incorrect :-) Just for the record: 900913 has never been an EPSG code, so prefixing it with EPSG: is incorrect :-)

]]>